Archive notice: The Initial Report is preserved inside Plain Thinking on VORASYNC. Archived issue text remains as originally published; new Plain Thinking issues and supplements publish at vorasync.ai/plain-thinking.
In 2019 — three years before the release of popular U.S. chatbot ChatGPT — Purdue University was already thinking about harnessing “AI” for the justice system. While not nearly as advanced as modern AI, the $2 million, federally funded project would have upgraded the technology for monitoring probationers and parolees. This month, the U.S. government released an audit of the program, which collapsed in 2023 on deployment failures and insufficient oversight and rules. The case sheds light on novel questions around testing new technology on people involved with the justice system.
Buzzwords
Illustrative diagram. The Initial Report.
Attention on AI “harnesses” is growing as AI systems move from mere chat sessions on the web to work settings where they can read files and take actions. A harness is the operating layer around a model — safety checks that determine what the AI can do.
Early public-sector guidance, including a 2024 report from the U.S. Department of Commerce, put many safeguards at the “harness” layer of AI. Researchers at Princeton have also argued that some of the more publicized improvements to AI systems were the result of better harnesses, not models(Kapoor et al., 2024).
“That’s when we learned the importance of correcting these AI-generated reports.”
Utah police sergeant, January, after a report claimed one of his officers turned into a frog.
$1.3 million
A prominent software engineer’s recent monthly spend on using AI.
Grant Morgan is an attorney, former prosecutor and former Tribune Publishing reporter who covered Gary, Indiana, and Chicago’s northern suburbs. Plain Thinking covers AI and consequential technology affecting lawyers, police and courts.